290 results for 'cat:"Civil Rights" AND cat:"Employment Discrimination"'.
J. Wyrick grants the government defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this lawsuit brought by a former air traffic controller trainee alleging discrimination on the basis of race under Title VII. The former trainee, who was dismissed from the training program along with another classmate “for failing to achieve a passing grade,” fails to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. She and the dismissed classmate sought reinstatement for “very different reasons,” meaning they were not similarly situated.
Court: USDC Western District of Oklahoma , Judge: Wyrick, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 5:20cv1161, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Employment, employment Discrimination
J. Chun denies the university president's motion to dismiss the retaliation claim in the school faculty member's complaint alleging that the university president wrongfully fired the faculty member for putting a statement in his class syllabus, emails and outside his faculty office door about the Coast Salish tribe's claim to land that read, "I acknowledge that by the labor theory of property the Coast Salish people can claim historical ownership of almost none of the land currently occupied by the University of Washington." The school faculty member plausible states a First Amendment retaliation claim, because the school faculty member's speech concerned a matter of public concern, and the court cannot employ the applicable Pickering balancing test at this stage.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Chun, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv964, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Education, employment Discrimination
J. Mehalchick denies a borough’s motion to dismiss an age and disability discrimination claim brought by a former police officer who says he was forced to retire. The former police officer’s allegations were plausible because he was over 40, qualified for his job, hearing-impaired and replaced by a younger employee.
Court: USDC Middle District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Mehalchick, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv912, NOS: Civil Rights - Habeas Corpus, Categories: civil Rights, employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Parker grants the school system's summary judgment motion in this lawsuit brought by a teacher asserting claims under Title VII and the Tennessee Human Rights Act for discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliation. Certain discrete claims of harassment are time-barred, and her hostile work environment claim is not supported by the allegations.
Court: USDC Western District of Tennessee , Judge: Parker, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv2346, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Education, employment Discrimination
J. Hanen finds that evidence does not support an employee’s claims that his prior employer retaliated against him by investigating his conduct after he made complaints about discrimination. There is evidence that the employer initiated the investigation into personal expenditures charged by the employee to the company credit card before the employee made complaints of discrimination so the investigation could not have arisen as a retaliatory action. The employer’s request for summary judgment is granted.
Court: USDC Southern District of Texas, Judge: Hanen, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 4:22cv3454, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, employment Discrimination
J. Bloom approves a state commission’s motion to dismiss employment discrimination claim by a former employee who alleged he was harassed and fired due to a disability that made him fall asleep on the job. Because the former employee took no action for more than two years after initiating the case, he did not make a good faith effort to serve notice, as required.
Court: USDC Middle District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Bloom, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1820, NOS: Civil Rights - Habeas Corpus, Categories: civil Rights, employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Trauger grants the restaurant defendants' motion for summary judgment in this lawsuit brought by a former employee alleging age discrimination in connection with his termination. The former employee, who worked as a general manager, fails to show that his termination was due to his age. The defendants cited "his restaurant's culture, as evidenced by the complaints," and he does not establish that the reason was pretext for discrimination.
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Trauger, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv885, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Evidence, employment Discrimination
J. O’Connor finds that an attorney who claims that she was not promoted because she is female did not show that her employer’s reason for not promoting her is pretextual. The attorney’s claims that the qualifications of person hired for the position were exaggerated do not meet the requirement for pretext to a discriminatory decision that any reasonable employer would find the protected class member’s qualifications are superior. However, the attorney’s claims for failure to promote based on her age can proceed. The employer’s motion to dismiss claims of discrimination based on sex are granted but the motion to dismiss based on age is denied.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: O’Connor, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv566, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, employment Discrimination
J. Novak denies the department's motion to dismiss sex-based employment discrimination claims. The X-ray machines used on correctional officers can not differentiate between contraband and a menstruation product like tampons, pads, or IUDs. Every time the machine finds a foreign object, even if it is purely for menstruation, the correctional officers are subject to severely invasive strip searches. The department has failed to establish a policy that considers that its female employees will be subject to strip searches far more frequently than males purely due to sex-based characteristics.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Virginia, Judge: Novak , Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv757, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Government, employment Discrimination
J. Kagan finds that the circuit improperly dismissed workplace gender discrimination claims a police officer brought against the city because the court applied the wrong standard in requiring the officer to prove that being transferred to the intelligence division constituted a significant employment disadvantage, as that the transfer left her worse off was sufficient. She was transferred from a prestigious job working with police commanders to a primarily administrative job overseeing a single district's patrol officers; she often had to work weekends to make up for the new, less regular schedule; and her take-home car was taken away.
Court: US Supreme Court, Judge: Kagan, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 22-193 , Categories: civil Rights, employment Discrimination
J. Albregts refuses to dismiss a black worker's pro se race and national origin discrimination and retaliation claims to proceed. The temp employee says it took longer than normal to receive an offer for full-time employment from Crocs. He also had difficulty obtaining his employee discount code and was ignored when he sought help. That the employee was reassigned after complaining, among other specific allegations, is sufficient to allege retaliation.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Albregts , Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 2:24cv582, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. McGlynn rules a former Walmart employee may pursue race discrimination against the superstore. The employee sufficiently alleged that she was terminated because she is Black, due to her supervisor's racist views, and not for disciplinary issues.
Court: USDC Southern District of Illinois, Judge: McGlynn, Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv1926, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: civil Rights, Employment, employment Discrimination
J. Silva grants the city's motion for summary judgment on a black former police chief's allegations the president of the police union discriminated against her on the basis of race and sex. Though the chief was hired to facilitate departmental change with support from the city, complaints were lodged after she began implementing new procedures, particularly that involving discipline for officer misconduct. The union president says the chief lacked accountability, creating greater division within the department. As the chief's subordinate, the union president is not liable for the chief's termination or any alleged due process violation.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Silva , Filed On: April 5, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv1761, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Due Process, employment Discrimination
J. Boyle grants 21 organizations’ motions to dismiss allegations of gender, age, national origin and disability discrimination brought by an accountant who was not hired by any of them. In this pro se action, the accountant fails to state anything more specific than the facts that he applied to the positions and was not accepted to them. This is not sufficient to state a discrimination claim in any instance.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Boyle, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv38, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, Employment, employment Discrimination
J. Donnelly denies in part a Brooklyn law firm’s motion for summary judgment and preserves a single claim for race-based hostile work environment, finding enough evidence to allege one of its partners’ actions, which included espousing white supremacist views, playing Confederate songs in the workplace and watching racist videos on his computer, was pervasive. The main question for the jury is whether the partner was her supervisor or a coworker for purposes of employer liability.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Donnelly, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 1:19cv1979, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: civil Rights, employment Discrimination